|
Re: Video Review Needs to Happen Now
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryan Dognaux
For our testing this year we will just say if the head referee accepts the challenge request, a match replay will be issued. Keeps it really simple regardless of the play in question. May not be what would actually be implemented eventually, especially in certain cases like missing a game piece being scored, but it's what we'll try.
|
OK, let us know how it works out.
You probably already took into account that if I'm a team focused on winning, even if my alliance gets beaten by 100 to nothing in a match, I might decide to protest a minor call, just hoping to trigger a rematch.
Similarly, if I haven't used my protest(s) yet, I might automatically protest any/every loss that would take my alliance out of the eliminations, hoping to trigger a replay.
If I'm especially mischievous, I might purposefully create some sketchy situations, just so that I can increase my chances of having an opportunity to successfully protest a call.
If these scenarios are something you want to discourage, to avoid slow-downs, I'm not sure how you can do it.
Blake
__________________
Blake Ross, For emailing me, in the verizon.net domain, I am blake
VRC Team Mentor, FTC volunteer, 5th Gear Developer, Husband, Father, Triangle Fraternity Alumnus (ky 76), U Ky BSEE, Tau Beta Pi, Eta Kappa Nu, Kentucky Colonel
Words/phrases  I avoid: basis, mitigate, leveraging, transitioning, impact (instead of affect/effect), facilitate, programmatic, problematic, issue (instead of problem), latency (instead of delay), dependency (instead of prerequisite), connectivity, usage & utilize (instead of use), downed, functionality, functional, power on, descore, alumni (instead of alumnus/alumna), the enterprise, methodology, nomenclature, form factor (instead of size or shape), competency, modality, provided(with), provision(ing), irregardless/irrespective, signage, colorized, pulsating, ideate
|