View Single Post
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-03-2016, 23:13
jds2001 jds2001 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Jon Stanley
FRC #4263 (CyberDrgaon)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 160
jds2001 has much to be proud ofjds2001 has much to be proud ofjds2001 has much to be proud ofjds2001 has much to be proud ofjds2001 has much to be proud ofjds2001 has much to be proud ofjds2001 has much to be proud ofjds2001 has much to be proud ofjds2001 has much to be proud of
Re: Team Update 16 (2016)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffrafa View Post
I can't find the video of it, but I saw this happen at a week 1 event - a red robot drove across the midline and pushed a stationary blue robot several inches transitively through a boulder (no direct robot contact). Only 1 foul was called due to how the rule had been written. I was a ref in week 2, and we discussed this scenario prior. We decided since R13 did not mention transitive contact, we would enforce it the same way as was done in week 1. I'm glad to see the loophole closed, as it preserves the intent of the violation.
I was also a ref in week 2, and this exact thing happened. We asked about it, and got a response of no automatic cross. I guess since it happened (apparently more than once), it caused them to look at it and change the rule to something that more closely matches the intent. A good change, IMO.
__________________
- Official Scorer


Disclaimer: I volunteer for FIRST as a referee. All opinions are my own, and do not reflect those of FIRST.
Reply With Quote