View Single Post
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-03-2016, 23:34
themccannman's Avatar
themccannman themccannman is offline
registered lurker
AKA: Jake McCann
FRC #3501
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 432
themccannman has a reputation beyond reputethemccannman has a reputation beyond reputethemccannman has a reputation beyond reputethemccannman has a reputation beyond reputethemccannman has a reputation beyond reputethemccannman has a reputation beyond reputethemccannman has a reputation beyond reputethemccannman has a reputation beyond reputethemccannman has a reputation beyond reputethemccannman has a reputation beyond reputethemccannman has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Rethinking the Low bar

Quote:
Originally Posted by marshall View Post
Actually, a low COM is not the only key to not flipping over. As crazy as it may sound, our originally tall robot (1 inch shy of max height) that we had in Palmetto could tip over crossing defenses despite having a COM that was only 5~6 inches above the ground.

The second key is not the COM in the static case but the overall location of weight in the dynamic case which can be aided by distributing weight out to the edges of the robot.

Granted, I'm not a physics whiz and I'd love to have someone like Ether comment on this but I believe it to be true based on our experience with adding ankle weights to our robot in Palmetto and seeing the same thing work for another team here at the last NC District event.
The only thing that determines when an object tips over is when it's COM passes outside of it's footprint projected in the direction of gravity (downward).
__________________
All posts here are purely my own opinion.
2011-2015: 1678
2016: 846
2017 - current: 3501
Reply With Quote