|
Re: Poll-Video Replay
LoganK - What you wrote made sense, but you left something out.
When would the stronghold referees look at the video?
Would each match be followed by 1-5 minutes of hectic searching through the video by each ref as they attempted to double-check all the calls that they remember might have needed a 2nd look?
Would refs slap a button, or do something similar, during the match to mark (in the recording) each spot in the video they wanted to examine post-match? If not, finding the spot(s) they want to review could be a hugely confusing memory test.
Similarly, each call they made (or didn't make), or scoring credit they awarded (or didn't award) would need to be correlated with the recording, so that they don't have to have memorized that info too.
In soccer, and in many other sports, refs get to stop the action to make a "call" (or the action stops for them (When the only ball goes out of bounds)). FRC is exactly the opposite situation; and that is a very important difference.
Back to the Yes/No poll ....
__________________
Blake Ross, For emailing me, in the verizon.net domain, I am blake
VRC Team Mentor, FTC volunteer, 5th Gear Developer, Husband, Father, Triangle Fraternity Alumnus (ky 76), U Ky BSEE, Tau Beta Pi, Eta Kappa Nu, Kentucky Colonel
Words/phrases  I avoid: basis, mitigate, leveraging, transitioning, impact (instead of affect/effect), facilitate, programmatic, problematic, issue (instead of problem), latency (instead of delay), dependency (instead of prerequisite), connectivity, usage & utilize (instead of use), downed, functionality, functional, power on, descore, alumni (instead of alumnus/alumna), the enterprise, methodology, nomenclature, form factor (instead of size or shape), competency, modality, provided(with), provision(ing), irregardless/irrespective, signage, colorized, pulsating, ideate
Last edited by gblake : 18-03-2016 at 01:13.
|