Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartan710
At our event this weekend we went 13 for 15 in scaling. So to say that those teams are better isn't really correct. It just means that their alliances were better.
|
Firstly, these results only account for qualification matches. I'm not sure what your climb success rate was in quals, but the data potentially implies that your team was about 9/12.
Secondly, the calculated contribution results do a pretty good job of separating individual teams out from their random alliances
given that the metric of interest is separable. Scale points are pretty separable, that is, whether or not a given robot on an alliance scales has little impact on whether another robot on this alliance scales. Crossing points are not so separable (which is why I did not originally post the crossing rankings) since a robot that can cross all defenses will almost never contribute 50 crossing points.