Quote:
Originally Posted by rich2202
The problem with the question is that the GDC is trying to be sensitive to R9, blue box A and C
So, if the purpose of a robot piece is to block cameras (limit the vision), then it is a violation of R9.
If the purpose is to block shots, then that is ok, as it is an obstacle that robot designers are supposed to take into account.
So, put up an opaque piece of fabric that is supposed to interfere with boulder shooting, and you are fine. If it happens to block vision, so be it.
The rule is intended to prevent a defending robot from intentionally shining a flashlight directly into the camera of the other robot.
As they say: Bad cases make bad law.
Just make sure the robot piece has a purpose other than to interfere with sensing capabilities of the robot.
|
That's your (very reasonable) opinion.
However, the Head Ref at CVR ruled that all 4'6" blockers violated R9, Blue Box A. We had to cut large holes in our blockers to make them legal.
I believe this was a misinterpretation, but the rules and especially the Blue Box is not clear.
-Mike