Quote:
Originally Posted by rich2202
The problem with the question is that the GDC is trying to be sensitive to R9, blue box A and C
So, if the purpose of a robot piece is to block cameras (limit the vision), then it is a violation of R9.
If the purpose is to block shots, then that is ok, as it is an obstacle that robot designers are supposed to take into account.
So, put up an opaque piece of fabric that is supposed to interfere with boulder shooting, and you are fine. If it happens to block vision, so be it.
The rule is intended to prevent a defending robot from intentionally shining a flashlight directly into the camera of the other robot.
As they say: Bad cases make bad law.
Just make sure the robot piece has a purpose other than to interfere with sensing capabilities of the robot.
IMHO: As an R9 call, that is solely in the LRI's court. In general, G's are for Ref's, and R's are for RI's.
|
This sets up an interesting situation--what if a robot can shoot over a fully extended blocker, but it's camera can't see past the blocker because it's mounted so low? I don't think that was the intent of the rule, but that could make it illegal to block a catapult shooter, but allow blocking of low wheeled shooters.