|
Re: Your tall opaque robot is now illegal
Follow up Q&A on this
Quote:
Please clarify Q953 - If a robot meets the sizing requirements for R3 and does not have any markings that are similar to the field (i.e. markings meant to mimic vision targets) does it violate R9-C? If so, could you please expand on the criteria for what violates R9-C? For example: does translucent plastic sheeting or bumper noodles at the maximum height that was added between Qualifications and Eliminations that to a reasonable observer is for the purposes of blocking shots violate R9-C?
FRC1410 on 2016-03-22 | 2 Followers
A. A device which is not specifically intended to interfere with the remote sensing capabilities of another ROBOT, but merely happens to be in the way of that ROBOT sensing a desired object, while intended for other functions(such as blocking shots), would not be a violation of R9-C.
|
Darn it would been a lot easier making shots without a robot in the way of my low mounted camera. 
BTW I am pretty sure you can't use Lexan your bumpers, which this thread was originally abouts.
__________________
If you don't know what you should hook up then you should read a data sheet
Last edited by FrankJ : 23-03-2016 at 09:04.
|