|
Re: Your tall opaque robot is now illegal
Here is Q955 for FYI...
This was also a discussion on our LRI call last night and there was a reasonable solution to cover us until Q955 answer came out.
Q955
FRC Q&A Answered Questions
Q: Please clarify Q953 - If a robot meets the sizing requirements for R3 and does not have any markings that are similar to the field (i.e. markings meant to mimic vision targets) does it violate R9-C? If so, could you please expand on the criteria for what violates R9-C? For example: does translucent plastic sheeting or bumper noodles at the maximum height that was added between Qualifications and Eliminations that to a reasonable observer is for the purposes of blocking shots violate R9-C?
A: A device which is not specifically intended to interfere with the remote sensing capabilities of another ROBOT, but merely happens to be in the way of that ROBOT sensing a desired object, while intended for other functions(such as blocking shots), would not be a violation of R9-C.
(Asked by FRC1410 on 2016-03-22.)
__________________
Quote:
|
The views expressed are mine and should not be construed to represent the views of anyone else.
|
|