View Single Post
  #45   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 25-03-2016, 08:02
Greg McKaskle Greg McKaskle is offline
Registered User
FRC #2468 (Team NI & Appreciate)
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,748
Greg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond reputeGreg McKaskle has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Toggle Between Two Cameras in Vision Processing

The good/bad news post is from last season, and I believe fixed. Though I didn't personally verify this, I did file the bug report.

The camera exposure settings for all MS LifeCams seems to be odd on UVC/linux devices. The parameters are described and given ranges that various APIs will use to communicate requested properties to the camera. The MS LifeCam exposure is described as going from 5 to 20,000, with increment of one. That is a lot of range.

http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linu...uvc.devel/5717

That link is to a 2011 forum post about a lifeCam 5000, but explains the same behavior. I does list the magic values, which are twelve geometrically scaled numbers centered around 156. I don't have a camera to try, but if you can use the percentage equivalents, or make your own Set Exposure to avoid the floating point scaling, you can probably make a LifeCam specific Exposure VI work.

Greg McKaskle
Reply With Quote