View Single Post
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-03-2016, 18:31
ctt956 ctt956 is offline
Too many threads, too little time
FRC #0900 (♞The Zebracorns♞)
Team Role: Student
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Rookie Year: 2016
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 695
ctt956 is a splendid one to beholdctt956 is a splendid one to beholdctt956 is a splendid one to beholdctt956 is a splendid one to beholdctt956 is a splendid one to beholdctt956 is a splendid one to behold
Re: Disabled robots moving

Quote:
Originally Posted by cbale2000 View Post
My understanding of the rules is that fans are not required to be connected to motor controllers, as a result, cannot be expected to turn off when disabled. For that matter, motor controllers that use fans are specifically wired so they always run, effectively making Victors and Jaguar motor controllers illegal if the rule was to be interpenetrated this way.

This looks like an obvious case of a ref that needed to seek clarification on the rule. This is the kind of thing that should only require a little common sense, but it seems like more and more this stuff needs to be spelled out for people to avoid lawyering.
I'd think that if the fan is built in to a motor controller, it's legal as that's part of the controller. As with the practice robot I mentioned above, fans installed that weren't built in should only be a problem if they're unsafe(blades completely exposed).
__________________

"You know, it's amazing how many things you can take apart with just one ordinary screwdriver!" - Calvin, from Calvin and Hobbes
"There's nothing a little duct tape and surgical tubing can't accomplish." - Sheldon J. Plankton