View Single Post
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 27-03-2016, 11:43
ctt956 ctt956 is offline
Too many threads, too little time
FRC #0900 (♞The Zebracorns♞)
Team Role: Student
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Rookie Year: 2016
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 696
ctt956 is a splendid one to beholdctt956 is a splendid one to beholdctt956 is a splendid one to beholdctt956 is a splendid one to beholdctt956 is a splendid one to beholdctt956 is a splendid one to behold
Re: Low-Bar capable robot discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by GeeTwo View Post
As most robots are capable of driving over at least one other defense, I have not seen the low bar become a bottle neck.

Several (though not all) of the robots that obviously did not design to go under the low bar also seem to be more likely to tortuga on the category B and D defenses via tipping due to their high center of gravity. While there are certainly teams that made a mistake each way, I believe that more teams made a poor decision by deciding not to do the low bar than by deciding to do the low bar.
Agreed. From the competitions I've seen so far this year, taller robots tend to get stuck/flip when crossing anything other than Category C, with the exception of the Portcullis. Some of them also seem to be a bit slower, but maybe that's because the tall 'bots have high goal shooters, so they spend most of their time trying to shoot high goals.
__________________

"You know, it's amazing how many things you can take apart with just one ordinary screwdriver!" - Calvin, from Calvin and Hobbes
"There's nothing a little duct tape and surgical tubing can't accomplish." - Sheldon J. Plankton
Reply With Quote