View Single Post
  #24   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 27-03-2016, 19:44
Laaba 80 Laaba 80 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Joey
FRC #1714 (MORE Robotics)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 495
Laaba 80 has a reputation beyond reputeLaaba 80 has a reputation beyond reputeLaaba 80 has a reputation beyond reputeLaaba 80 has a reputation beyond reputeLaaba 80 has a reputation beyond reputeLaaba 80 has a reputation beyond reputeLaaba 80 has a reputation beyond reputeLaaba 80 has a reputation beyond reputeLaaba 80 has a reputation beyond reputeLaaba 80 has a reputation beyond reputeLaaba 80 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Wisconsin Regional 2016

Quote:
Originally Posted by XaulZan11 View Post
All that being said, my issue isn't with the refs at this event (I appreciate them letting teams play), but the rule books insistence on calling some penalties if and only if the opposing robot breaks or tips.
I think I disagree with you on the rule book insisting there be damage to cause a penalty. I didn't actively participate in this year's game so I haven't studied up on the rules, but I think G24 is the relevant rule. This reads to me as an intent penalty which allows the refs to use their discretion on calls. If a ref thinks a robot is trying to damage others, there is a penalty/yellow card. If the robot is actually incapacitated, then it's a red card. Maybe it's just my interpretation.

Watching the webcast, I thought the defense was out of control. I'm interested in watching some video so I can see if it really was as bad as I thought it was at the time. I was hoping the refs would call some penalties to get teams to calm down a bit.
__________________
Driving Record - 75-43-8
Coaching Record - 92-65
Reply With Quote