View Single Post
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-04-2016, 06:32
GaryVoshol's Avatar
GaryVoshol GaryVoshol is offline
Cogito ergo arbitro
no team
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 5,743
GaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Judge Consistency Between Events

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Schreiber View Post
Again, I question that the wording used by the judges implied the team was forgotten. More accurately it likely meant that the other team had impressed more folks, or the folks were more adept at swaying others. Or any of a dozen things.
My thoughts as well. "Your team didn't come up" may mean that the judges that saw your team had another candidate that they thought was better qualified and they presented that team to the rest of the judges.

Here's an example. I've judged in FLL a couple of times. There was a team that was being considered for the Champions Award. Someone noted that the team wasn't nominated for any of the Project awards; does that indicate they were not a well-rounded team? I mentioned that they were on our short list but not at the top and so they weren't mentioned before. They were good; it's just that there were others that were better.
__________________
(since 2004)
Reply With Quote