View Single Post
  #38   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-04-2016, 12:00
Doug Frisk's Avatar
Doug Frisk Doug Frisk is offline
Keeping Score
AKA: Doug Frisk
no team
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Behind the FMS
Posts: 350
Doug Frisk has a reputation beyond reputeDoug Frisk has a reputation beyond reputeDoug Frisk has a reputation beyond reputeDoug Frisk has a reputation beyond reputeDoug Frisk has a reputation beyond reputeDoug Frisk has a reputation beyond reputeDoug Frisk has a reputation beyond reputeDoug Frisk has a reputation beyond reputeDoug Frisk has a reputation beyond reputeDoug Frisk has a reputation beyond reputeDoug Frisk has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 2016 Minnesota State Champs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Knufire View Post
What about teams that specifically build for the tournaments they're attending? I've seen several teams show up to their first tournament with major subsystems that are intentionally left off. Early season tournaments are generally less competitive than tournaments later in the season, and planning to scale your robots ability to the tournaments you're attending is one method to build a robot that you don't have the resources to finish in six weeks. I don't see this as not coming prepared, but rather strategic planning.
You're arguing that teams that have the money to extend their build season through competition should be given an advantage over teams that actually build robots in six weeks.

Using the first regional puts everyone on a level playing field. If a team decides to not build a functional robot before bag and tag then that's their problem, they shouldn't be rewarded for it.
Reply With Quote