|
Re: Is FRC giving high CG robots a free pass on defense?
I personally am more upset at the inconsistency of these calls.
I mean waterloo qf1-1 we were in a pushing match that resulted in our opponent getting underneath our bumpers and then driving us from the secret passage to the front of the tower (defense 3) before we finally flipped (we are 13" high and have been almost vertical on the field wall without flipping) and that was not given any card at all.
I'm fine with that decision on its own, but its upsetting to compare that decision to the one shown in the OP video. That was a clear bump and retreat defense on a tall, tippy robot, in a tall, tippy position.
The comparison between the two calls is the thing that is the most frustrating. Either call on there own is fine.
As long as its called consistently then there is no problem. The issue is that it is not being called like that.
|