View Single Post
  #58   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-04-2016, 15:20
Hitchhiker 42's Avatar
Hitchhiker 42 Hitchhiker 42 is offline
Roboter
AKA: Mark Lavrentyev
FRC #4557 (FullMetal Falcons)
Team Role: Programmer
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Rookie Year: 2015
Location: Cromwell, CT
Posts: 502
Hitchhiker 42 is a splendid one to beholdHitchhiker 42 is a splendid one to beholdHitchhiker 42 is a splendid one to beholdHitchhiker 42 is a splendid one to beholdHitchhiker 42 is a splendid one to beholdHitchhiker 42 is a splendid one to beholdHitchhiker 42 is a splendid one to beholdHitchhiker 42 is a splendid one to behold
Re: 2016 IRI Rule Change Suggestions

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clinton Bolinger View Post
- Allow launching balls from your court yard, but not from the neutral zone.
- Remove Category A & C Defenses. Putting the following defenses out for every match:
-- Low Bar
-- Rockwall
-- Rough Terrain
-- Moat
-- Ramparts
- Bolt the defenses down instead of using the "pins"
- Breach is 5/5 Defenses

Most of my reasons for removing the defense selection is to increase field reset times which will allow for more matches. At IRI the defenses will be breached over 90% of the time (MSC has a breach of 96%). Also, the strategic advantage of selecting your defenses will be much less.

Stronghold is a very strategic game but most people are delusional when thinking the large portion of the strategy comes from picking the defenses.

-Clinton
I disagree with completely taking out category A. Although for IRI it won't provide much of an additional challenge, making the breach even easier is the wrong direction to go. If we're going for constant defenses, stick the Cheval in, and be done with it. Don't completely use the easiest defenses.
__________________



2016 - NE District Championship Entrepreneurship Award
2016 - Hartford District Industrial Design Award
2016 - Waterbury District Engineering Inspiration Award
Reply With Quote