View Single Post
  #45   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-04-2016, 19:53
cbale2000's Avatar
cbale2000 cbale2000 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Chris Bale
FRC #5712 (Gray Matter)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Saginaw, MI
Posts: 935
cbale2000 has a reputation beyond reputecbale2000 has a reputation beyond reputecbale2000 has a reputation beyond reputecbale2000 has a reputation beyond reputecbale2000 has a reputation beyond reputecbale2000 has a reputation beyond reputecbale2000 has a reputation beyond reputecbale2000 has a reputation beyond reputecbale2000 has a reputation beyond reputecbale2000 has a reputation beyond reputecbale2000 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Cheapish CNC machine

We've had pretty good experiences with our X-Carve, as others have said it's great for wood and polycarbonate, but you have to take it slow with aluminum (and use cutting fluid).

Really it all depends on what you want to build. In our case we built our chassis out of 3/8" polycarbonate so using it to cut our chassis side panels is no problem, and the tolerances are more than enough if you're building a chain drive; however when we cut some custom 1/8" aluminum gearbox mounting plates for our 3-CIM Ball shifters, we had to intentionally undersize the holes and then finish them on our Bridgeport CNCs.

Basically our X-Carve is pretty good at positioning accurately, but not great at making round pockets consistently. If all you were doing was drilling straight holes and not doing any pockets, you could likely do it all day long and not have any issues with accuracy.

I don't think I would try to build an entire robot out of aluminum using an X-Carve, but using it for mostly polycarbonate parts with only a few, small aluminum pieces is certainly doable.

One thing to note for these machines is that you either have to babysit them with a vacuum or construct some sort of dust collector for it, because even the slightest bit of material flying off the part can get lodged between the tracks and the wheels and throw off the positioning of the entire unit, ruining the part. If you wanted to get really creative, adding a closed-loop control system to it would also solve the problem, and improve accuracy.
Reply With Quote