Quote:
Originally Posted by hrench
weaverSam8,
Sounds like a great idea and a great use of computer-thinking to figure things out.
But I think I see a gap? Just because the statistics show that a robot 'hasn't' done something doesn't mean that it can't.
|
From a scouting/strategy perspective, for anything but the low bar I would not be comfortable trusting a team that says they can do something they have not demonstrated before. A team that has never done something, in my eyes, is almost equivalent to a robot that cannot do something, barring very rare circumstances.
Sometimes it works out to trust another team with it, and other times it doesn't.