View Single Post
  #28   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-05-2016, 13:05
346CADmen's Avatar
346CADmen 346CADmen is offline
Registered User
FRC #0346
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Virginia
Posts: 93
346CADmen is a splendid one to behold346CADmen is a splendid one to behold346CADmen is a splendid one to behold346CADmen is a splendid one to behold346CADmen is a splendid one to behold346CADmen is a splendid one to behold346CADmen is a splendid one to behold
Re: Questions about FIRST Future

Quote:
Originally Posted by swootton View Post

While the overall cost to attend "all" the events is more, the cost per play is significantly lower and makes advancement more achievable for the average team. At bare minimum we get 2 full events with 12 plays each for $5000 even with no advancement. That's half the cost per play than 2 regionals or the same cost for 2x as many plays depending how you care to look at it.

We would not want to go back to a regional model even if we had the choice.
Sorry the cost per play view is similar to saying I get a better deal on a restaurant meal if I chew more. But agree the district model does seem the better way for our team too. However am sure many teams in CHP district would say different. I think changes will come to ease the district burdens as well.

Back to thread topic. I too love this program and want to see it continue to grow. But worry that the growth may dilute the product in some way. Does FIRST have a team saturation number? Can their be too many?
Reply With Quote