Quote:
Originally Posted by R.C.
I'm not saying to do that, I'm just saying there are video replays. FIRST would have to specify what they would use replays for.
|
So what can and cannot be reviewable?
In college football, it's things related to possession, side lines, goal line, and end line (including goal posts). That's it. You can't review holding, pass interference, the cheap shot on the line, or Ndamukong Suh stepping on your face.
Looking to FRC...
Well, on the definitely "can" be reviewed list would be scores that were missed. Things like a boulder being stuck in the chute, a defense cross being missed, bad frisbee count (2013), etc.
On the definitely "can't" be reviewed list are most fouls. Particularly any foul where you get a warning before the penalty, like pinning. To retroactively invoke fouls is unfair to the team that receives the penalty, as others have posted here.
To the OP's second post: You don't want us to focus on your particular situation yet you use it as your sole example for establishing video review. Video review wouldn't have helped your situation and would not have "eliminated moments like these".
I therefore fail to see a compelling argument to implement video review. QED.