View Single Post
  #22   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-05-2016, 19:40
Red2486's Avatar
Red2486 Red2486 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Kinney Anderson
FRC #1011 (CRUSH)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Arizona
Posts: 112
Red2486 is a splendid one to beholdRed2486 is a splendid one to beholdRed2486 is a splendid one to beholdRed2486 is a splendid one to beholdRed2486 is a splendid one to beholdRed2486 is a splendid one to beholdRed2486 is a splendid one to behold
Re: Why is Engineering Inspiration viewed as second place to the Chairman's Award?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Broboraider View Post
Not a 100% sure on this, but from region to region are all CA candidates judged on the same criteria/ grading sheet? If so is there universal criteria for EI or does that vary from regional to regional?
From the FRC Administrative Manual:

"6.14.7 Engineering Inspiration Award
Celebrates outstanding success in advancing respect and appreciation for engineering within a team’s school or organization and community.

6.14.7.1 GUIDELINES
■ Extent and inventiveness of the team’s efforts to recruit students to engineering with particular emphasis on the most recent year’s efforts. Measurable success of those efforts.
■ Extent and effectiveness of the team’s community outreach efforts with particular emphasis on the most recent year’s efforts. Measurable success of those efforts.
■ A commitment to science and technology education among the team, school, and community.
■ Achievement of the FIRST mission and ability to communicate that at the competition and away from it.
■ Efforts are ongoing, not strictly concentrated on the build and competition season."

While I am sure that the judging varies from event to event, I am fairly certain that the award follows this criteria. As far as differences between EI and Chairman's, you can see that here in the "emphasis on the most recent year's efforts" and "commitment to science and technology education". Much of the language is similar to the Chairman's Award, though, and so we can see where the overlap may occur.

The Chairman's Award is much easier to judge consistently (though surely discrepancies still do exist), I believe, than other awards because of the constraints on submissions. Often, Chairman's judges are also more experienced judges with that award in particular or with the rest of the FRC judging process.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Broboraider View Post
If there isn't an universal criteria for EI could this be a reason why a team might win CA at one regional but then give their same presentation at different regional to different judges and win Regional EI?
I'm not sure what you mean here. Could you explain more?
__________________
Mentor - CRUSH, FRC Team 1011 - 2015 to Present
Student - CocoNuts, FRC Team 2486 - 2010 to 2014
2014 Dean's List Winner
--
"Every child deserves a champion, an adult who will never give up on them, who understands the power of connection, and insists that they become the best they can possibly be. We can do this. We're educators. We're born to make a difference." -Rita Pierson
Reply With Quote