View Single Post
  #41   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-05-2016, 12:47
martin417's Avatar
martin417 martin417 is offline
Opinionated old goat
AKA: Martin Wilson
no team
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Buford, GA
Posts: 719
martin417 has a reputation beyond reputemartin417 has a reputation beyond reputemartin417 has a reputation beyond reputemartin417 has a reputation beyond reputemartin417 has a reputation beyond reputemartin417 has a reputation beyond reputemartin417 has a reputation beyond reputemartin417 has a reputation beyond reputemartin417 has a reputation beyond reputemartin417 has a reputation beyond reputemartin417 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Poofs Red Card Question?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arevan View Post
...If bumpers fell off of my robot and I knew it would be disabled, I would definitely try to get on the batter before I was disabled. I couldn't find anything in the rule book that allows the refs to retroactively take back points in a case where you weren't disabled fast enough.

If that is what happened, I would consider that very smart gameplay by that team.
For the example I gave, the robot did not meet the criteria for a challenge. to challenge, the robot must be fully supported by the batter. If the bumper is on the carpet, halfway across the field,then the robot is not fully supported by the batter.

I know that somebody will say "what if a zip tie falls off a robot, then the robot is not fully supported by the batter" That opens up the whole issue of refs trying to figure out what constitutes the robot. I argue that the bumper is a required component, without which the robot would not be allowed to compete, and as such, is part of the robot regardless of whether it is still attached.
__________________
Former Mentor Team 1771
Former mentor Team 4509

Last edited by martin417 : 04-05-2016 at 13:01.
Reply With Quote