View Single Post
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-05-2016, 09:18
Alan Anderson's Avatar
Alan Anderson Alan Anderson is offline
Software Architect
FRC #0045 (TechnoKats)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Kokomo, Indiana
Posts: 9,112
Alan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Lesson Learned 2016 - The Negative

Quote:
Originally Posted by BoilerMentor View Post
My assertion is that FIRST made the bumper zone too large in vertical span. If it had been reduced in height about the current center of the zone, say from 5"-11" many of the red card situations for frame perimeter violations could have been avoided.
I don't understand how further restricting the options for bumper height would help reduce problems teams are having with bumper height.

Quote:
The only reasonable excuse I heard for bumpers being at the maximum height position was to make the travel required to complete the scale smaller, since judgement was based on position of bumpers relative to the low goal.
Yeah, I'd call that an excuse. But here's an actual reason: higher bumpers give more options for ball intake mechanisms.
Reply With Quote