View Single Post
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-05-2016, 14:26
bam-bam bam-bam is offline
Registered User
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: West Lafayette
Posts: 1,220
bam-bam has a reputation beyond reputebam-bam has a reputation beyond reputebam-bam has a reputation beyond reputebam-bam has a reputation beyond reputebam-bam has a reputation beyond reputebam-bam has a reputation beyond reputebam-bam has a reputation beyond reputebam-bam has a reputation beyond reputebam-bam has a reputation beyond reputebam-bam has a reputation beyond reputebam-bam has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Post-Championships Performance Analysis and Awards

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cog View Post
I was so extremely confused when you guys abandoned that strategy for Einstein. It seemed like you would have smashed the competition of you had kept that up.

Sent from my HTC6525LVW using Tapatalk
You know, it could've been possible to use that strategy during semis against the Carver alliance. They managed to enact that in play it seems for semis 1, but some untimely misses by 148 nullified that.

What would've worked, I believe, was 2990 ejecting the balls into Carver's SP. Yes, they would be giving the boulders away to Carver, but they also will end up canceling out the bowling advantage the HPs have. Carver couldn't cycle quick enough to protect the balls, and leaving a crowd of boulders there would leave 148 open to constantly scoring and scoring. If 1678 and 148 time their shots correctly, the HPs on the Carver alliance would essentially be starving themselves.
__________________
FRC 1529: 2010-2011
FRC 1501: 2012-2013, 2012 BMR winners (thank you 1756 & 4028)
FRC 461: 2015
2014 FF Elgin Clock Award Winner(Automated Scoring)
Reply With Quote