Quote:
Originally Posted by gblake
Quite frankly, in your first point, you appear to making an assumption that (IMO) is not reasonable. The assumption I think I see is that if some non-trivial parts of teams, or some non-trivial numbers of team guests, arrive later than others; that the rest of the world has to allow them all to sit with whatever part of that team sat down first, and/or allow them all to sit at the most favorable location any team member claimed.
What the rule says (implies) is that when folks arrive late, they can either form a new group that sits wherever seats are open, or the entire group (both the original- and later-arrivals) can move as much as is necessary to find a large-enough block(s) of seats.
This is precisely the point. I am more than confident that whoever wrote the No Saving Seats rule was 100% aware of your first scenario, and wrote the rule to expressly forbid a "saving seats" response to it.
If people stop saving seats for folks who are arriving "later"  , I think the second point you make will very nearly disappear. There might be a few things left to iron out (especially around the lunchtime topic), but I predict the big picture will be much improved.
Blake |
You're solution is unreasonable and even unworkable. You're saying that if teams can't get their entire group there in line at 5 am they are FOL and they should expect that to stay together they will as a group have to get up and move, as a group, to another large block of seats (that most likely doesn't exist elsewhere within view of the field). In other words, only small teams are rewarded by remaining small so that they can continue to sit together.
That doesn't sound like a recipe for "making it loud."