|
Re: FRC rules around seating need to change.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Citrus Dad
You're solution is unreasonable and even unworkable. You're saying that if teams can't get their entire group there in line at 5 am they are FOL and they should expect that to stay together they will as a group have to get up and move, as a group, to another large block of seats (that most likely doesn't exist elsewhere within view of the field). In other words, only small teams are rewarded by remaining small so that they can continue to sit together.
That doesn't sound like a recipe for "making it loud."
|
It is reasonable and it is workable. There is prima facie evidence all over the place. Many teams, both large and small, follow the no saving seats rule, and things work out OK for them.
You personally might not like the rule, but FIRST believes it is reasonable (they published it), and FIRST believes that it is workable.
I agree with them.
__________________
Blake Ross, For emailing me, in the verizon.net domain, I am blake
VRC Team Mentor, FTC volunteer, 5th Gear Developer, Husband, Father, Triangle Fraternity Alumnus (ky 76), U Ky BSEE, Tau Beta Pi, Eta Kappa Nu, Kentucky Colonel
Words/phrases  I avoid: basis, mitigate, leveraging, transitioning, impact (instead of affect/effect), facilitate, programmatic, problematic, issue (instead of problem), latency (instead of delay), dependency (instead of prerequisite), connectivity, usage & utilize (instead of use), downed, functionality, functional, power on, descore, alumni (instead of alumnus/alumna), the enterprise, methodology, nomenclature, form factor (instead of size or shape), competency, modality, provided(with), provision(ing), irregardless/irrespective, signage, colorized, pulsating, ideate
|