View Single Post
  #98   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-05-2016, 16:53
Andrew Schreiber Andrew Schreiber is offline
Data Nerd
FRC #0079
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Misplaced Michigander
Posts: 4,057
Andrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond repute
Re: What COTS parts would you like to see?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rangel(kf7fdb) View Post
Why couldn't a gyro be an alternative to having encoders on the robot? If the gyro was part of the board, it could likely still be kept all together. I'm not sure if we even used the encoders for our vision tracking this year and we hit every autonomous shot at champs. I'd imagine a game with a bigger goal would be even better.

Edit: Granted, we did use the encoders for going forward a set distance in teleop. This probably would effect our accuracy in autonomous. I would imagine not by too much though. In teleop though, auto tracking would be unaffected by not having encoders.
Gyros tend to need to be level. You can cheat to an extent with some of the IMU boards doing a self leveling routine on startup and I guess that's probably a viable approach. Just don't forget it.

But why Encoders - At some point you need to get to a point on the field and that's pretty hard without encoders in the drive.
__________________




.
Reply With Quote