View Single Post
  #17   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-05-2016, 22:22
techhelpbb's Avatar
techhelpbb techhelpbb is offline
Registered User
FRC #0011 (MORT - Team 11)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Rookie Year: 1997
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,622
techhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 360 Degree Video... What do you guys think?

It is too bad FIRST did not go with the suggestion to use low frequency RF for FMS and get out of the WiFi business. Then you could use whatever WiFi you could get your hands on.

I suspect you could get stereo video from the robot with 7Mbps at 800x600 if you reduce your color depth (think grayscale), deeply compress and can manage to avoid a migraine at low frame rate.

If you were clever you might put a coprocessor on the robot and join the frames such that you must send a synchronized pair either interspersed or bound at the short edge. I suspect interspersed would yield greater compression.

Last edited by techhelpbb : 12-05-2016 at 22:26.
Reply With Quote