View Single Post
  #36   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-05-2016, 16:54
GaryVoshol's Avatar
GaryVoshol GaryVoshol is offline
Cogito ergo arbitro
no team
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 5,734
GaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 2016 IRI - Rule Changes and Reasoning

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Fultz View Post
In your scenario, Match 6 would be used to calculate the tie-breaker.

We are working on a listing to capture the scenarios we can think of and how they would be decided. Hopefully not needed, but we want to have it defined in advance.
That's exactly how I interpreted the rule. I don't think you need to spend too much time calculating all the possibilities. Something simple like, "If teams get a tie score in 3 matches in an elimination round, the tie-breaker rules will apply to subsequent matches for those 2 teams in that round."
__________________
(since 2004)
Reply With Quote