View Single Post
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-05-2016, 11:43
jgerstein jgerstein is online now
Registered User
FRC #1257 (Parallel Universe)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 50
jgerstein is a splendid one to beholdjgerstein is a splendid one to beholdjgerstein is a splendid one to beholdjgerstein is a splendid one to beholdjgerstein is a splendid one to beholdjgerstein is a splendid one to behold
Re: What can FIRST do to increase FRC team sustainability?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian Curtis View Post
What years are FRC teams most likely to fail? I would guess something like years 2 & 5, but I'd love to know the actual answer. Can someone generate those numbers real quick?
I was curious about this too, so I pulled some data from TBA. A few teams show up a year or two before their rookie year because of off-seasons, but not enough to have a major effect on the numbers.

The last two tabs are the raw data I pulled from TBA and an expanded table showing which years each team was active in.

Team Survival

Sheet 1 (% of active teams by rookie year): Each row represents a rookie year (there were no 1993 rookies, so I left 1993 out). Each column is a year from 1992 through 2016. Each cell contains the percent of teams from that rookie year that were active in the given year. For example: Cell V12 indicates that in 2011, 45% of the teams that were founded in 2004 were still active.

Sheet 2 (# of active teams by rookie year): Each row represents a rookie year (there were no 1993 rookies, so I left 1993 out). Each column is a year from 1992 through 2016. Each cell contains the number of teams from that rookie year that were active in the given year. For example: Cell V12 indicates that in 2011, 75 of the 403 teams that were founded in 2004 were still active.

The other sheets are not particularly useful for looking at directly.

Last edited by jgerstein : 20-05-2016 at 12:28. Reason: Added a little more info about the spreadsheet
Reply With Quote