View Single Post
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 02-06-2016, 00:36
frcguy's Avatar
frcguy frcguy is offline
Unregistered Unuser
AKA: Nicholas Dal Porto
FRC #5940 (B.R.E.A.D.)
Team Role: Tactician
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Burlingame, California
Posts: 862
frcguy has a reputation beyond reputefrcguy has a reputation beyond reputefrcguy has a reputation beyond reputefrcguy has a reputation beyond reputefrcguy has a reputation beyond reputefrcguy has a reputation beyond reputefrcguy has a reputation beyond reputefrcguy has a reputation beyond reputefrcguy has a reputation beyond reputefrcguy has a reputation beyond reputefrcguy has a reputation beyond repute
Re: New FRC Youtube show concept

Quote:
Originally Posted by FarmerJohn View Post
I like the idea.

How are you going to stay objective and unbiased with these videos? I'm sure you'd be approached by FRC distributors wanting coverage of their products (or trying to negate negative views of their products).

We would be happy to cover companies products if they ask us. I believe companies tailoring to FRC teams are not the type to manipulate reviewers. That being said, we would not tolerate such a situation and fail to be objective because we are asked by a manufacturer.

How much serious and in-depth testing do you plan on doing? Will you post your methods? If someone points out a flaw in your methods, how open would you be to redacting those results and trying again?

Reasonably in-depth. Using the product over a medium length period of time most likely. We would post our testing methods and would be fine redoing a review if we make an error the community notices.

In your reviews, if you come across an inferior product, how would you present it? Would you openly critique a product you thought teams shouldn't use knowing that the developers of that product would likely be watching your video? Would you censor negative opinions for the sake of GP? Is everything going to be "a great product?"

We certainly will not censor our opinions, but we won't go on outright rants either. Negative feedback/criticism, if present, will be presented in a constructive and helpful way so the manufacturer can improve their product.

How are you critiquing these products, and from what point of view? Are you focusing on their effectiveness for an FRC robot, their viability for a team? Their versatility in use? Are you focusing your reviews from the perspective of a specific kind of team? Are you planning to examine multiple perspectives?

Multiple perspectives, and certain perspectives for certain products.

How much experience do you have with these COTS products and effectively evaluating them?

With a robot that is mostly COTS, we have a lot of experience with such products and their use.

Overall I think this can be a great project. I ask these difficult questions because they help define the show and its values. This has a lot of potential, and with the right character can be a great hit.
I answered your questions in bold to the best of my abilities. Please note that these answers are not finalized and could change, but those are our current stances on what you presented. Please ask if you have any more questions!
__________________


2016: Team 5940 (Silicon Valley Regional Rookie All-Star and Quarterfinalist, Curie Quarterfinalist)

Volunteer: 2016 (Chezy Champs Field Reset, Capital City Classic FTA, MadTown ThrowDown FTA)
Reply With Quote