I don't think anyone will get "hurt" with this proposed system. That seems like over-reacting to me. This seems harmless and similar to kids training each other (which our kids do all the time, by the way!)
One thing I will say. I encourage my kids, my team, everyone I talk to, to "steal from the best, invent the rest".
I don't mean this as a slight, but the students on F4 do not represent the premier contributors and competitors of FRC. They are an enthusiastic group of students with at least one Dean's List winner, which is great.
However, if I was a student/mentor/anyone looking to better my situation, I would use the best resources I have available that I feel comfortable using. My post here indicates my feelings around this topic:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Corsetto
I'd encourage any/all readers to avoid this "conditioning" approach.
If you want to win, steal from the best, invent the rest.
We (1678) have learned to use aluminum gears, cantilevered shafts, and #25 roller chain. We've learned mostly from Team 254 and VexPRO/WCP. These organizations have, between them, probably 10 of the best 50 mentors in the entire FRC program.
The best part is, for any reader out there, even if you are a freshman rookie in high school, these mentors are just an email or PM away. Ask 254 WHY they do cantilevered shafts every year and HOW they do it! Ask 1678 WHY we copy 254 and HOW we do it. Ask VexPRO/AM/WCP how to properly implement their products into your designs.
These resources are available. They are just an email away. You don't have to do any more guess work. You CAN be a better engineer by working harder and gleaning knowledge from people that have walked further down the path you are already on. Be encouraged that you are not alone, take advantage of the opportunities that are in front of you.
Learn from the best so you can BE the best.
-Mike
|
Best of luck, F4. I don't really listen to F4, but the fact that you're making it, I respect that.
-Mike