View Single Post
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-06-2016, 22:51
Cothron Theiss's Avatar
Cothron Theiss Cothron Theiss is offline
Registered User
FRC #4462 (Full Metal Jackets)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Kingston, Tennessee
Posts: 498
Cothron Theiss has a brilliant futureCothron Theiss has a brilliant futureCothron Theiss has a brilliant futureCothron Theiss has a brilliant futureCothron Theiss has a brilliant futureCothron Theiss has a brilliant futureCothron Theiss has a brilliant futureCothron Theiss has a brilliant futureCothron Theiss has a brilliant futureCothron Theiss has a brilliant futureCothron Theiss has a brilliant future
Re: pic: 2451 PWNAGE Planetary Drive

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr V View Post
In general a planetary reduction is less efficient than a spur gear reduction. However this set up isn't really a planetary reduction and should have a frictional loss essentially a simple spur gear reduction.

The extra frictional losses occur in a planetary reduction because of the increased number of gear to gear interfaces.
While what you've said is accurate for these purposes in a practical setting, if I understand some of the finer points about involute gear profiles correctly, a ring gear is always slightly less efficient than a regular spur gear. Since the gear teeth of the ring gear are directed inwards, there is an increased amount of interference, which would lead to SLIGHTLY less efficiency if you use the exact same gear teeth profiles and spacing as a regular spur gear reduction.

Now, you can regain this loss in efficiency by increasing the amount of cutout in the ring gear (changing the pressure angle), or decreasing the center distance between the ring gear and pinion gear. But since both of those solutions lead to less load carrying capacity in the gear mesh, it's a trade-off. Since the OP is going with a really interesting combination of the wheel and gearbox, I would NOT risk decreasing the load carrying capacity to regain a small percentage of efficiency.

***Disclaimer***
I may be totally wrong about all of what I just said, but that's what I think is accurate.
Reply With Quote