|
Re: Long Range Wifi
Quote:
Originally Posted by DonRotolo
Ah, missed that. Steel should be OK, at about 54k. Thanks Blake.
750 feet through the trees: The lower the frequency, the less the trees matter. So 2.4 GHz is better than 5 GHz, 900 MHz even better. Not sure there's a good commercial solution below that. Even 440 MHz is affected, while 150 hardly at all.
No chance you could run some Ethernet, is there? drainage culverts sometimes offer a solution to cross streets...
|
Yep, just don't ask me to be one of the poor saps who has to lug a steel pipe, plus the payload, up that 60' tower; and then hold the pipe & payload upright and aloft to attach it to the tower.
That's not a desk job. I'll create the drawings, if someone else will do the climbing  .
__________________
Blake Ross, For emailing me, in the verizon.net domain, I am blake
VRC Team Mentor, FTC volunteer, 5th Gear Developer, Husband, Father, Triangle Fraternity Alumnus (ky 76), U Ky BSEE, Tau Beta Pi, Eta Kappa Nu, Kentucky Colonel
Words/phrases  I avoid: basis, mitigate, leveraging, transitioning, impact (instead of affect/effect), facilitate, programmatic, problematic, issue (instead of problem), latency (instead of delay), dependency (instead of prerequisite), connectivity, usage & utilize (instead of use), downed, functionality, functional, power on, descore, alumni (instead of alumnus/alumna), the enterprise, methodology, nomenclature, form factor (instead of size or shape), competency, modality, provided(with), provision(ing), irregardless/irrespective, signage, colorized, pulsating, ideate
|