View Single Post
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-06-2016, 15:02
asid61's Avatar
asid61 asid61 is online now
Registered User
AKA: Anand Rajamani
FRC #0115 (MVRT)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Cupertino, CA
Posts: 2,214
asid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond reputeasid61 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: OmniSwerve chassis Bottom View and Concept Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by GeeTwo View Post
The velocity vectors can add up so that the speed of the robot is greater than the speed that any individual wheel is driven. The issue is that with the number of rollers providing resistance to this motion, I find it unlikely that those two motors could achieve a significantly greater speed than one in which all three motors are providing drive force in the desired direction. The only way to know for sure is to build it.
Well, if you take the two non-pointing-in-the-right-direction motors and give them each an angle theta away from the main wheel...
If you assume velocity vectors add, then the output speed is (cos(theta)+1)*v0, right? If that's the case, as theta goes to 0* (AKA point all whee;s in the same direction) one would end up with just 2 times the target speed- but all the wheels are just pointing in the same direction like a tank drive. That doesn't make sense to me, is there another way to add it?
__________________
<Now accepting CAD requests and commissions>

Reply With Quote