Thread: Future FRC Technologies?
View Single Post
  #38   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-07-2016, 22:48
Bryce2471's Avatar
Bryce2471 Bryce2471 is offline
Alumnus
AKA: Bryce Croucher
FRC #2471 (Team Mean Machine)
Team Role: Mechanical
  
Join Date: Feb 2013
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Camas, WA
Posts: 423
Bryce2471 has much to be proud ofBryce2471 has much to be proud ofBryce2471 has much to be proud ofBryce2471 has much to be proud ofBryce2471 has much to be proud ofBryce2471 has much to be proud ofBryce2471 has much to be proud ofBryce2471 has much to be proud ofBryce2471 has much to be proud of
Re: Future FRC Technologies?
Quote:
Originally Posted by R.C. View Post
IMO lithium polymer wouldn't be a good choice for FRC. BUT Lithium phosphate or lifep04 is what FRC should switch to. Teams would have to buy fewer batteries and the same battery could last 2-4 matches!
QFT!

A123 cells (LiFeP04) would provide a much more reliable and capable power source for FRC robots. They have significantly higher energy density and power density than current batteries, but are still affordable and safe to operate.
__________________
FLL Team Future imagineers
2010 Oregon State Championships: Winners
2011 International Invite: First place Robot design, Second Place Robot Performance
FRC Team Mean Machine
2012 Seattle: Winning alliance
2013 Portland: Winning alliance
2013 Spokane: Winning alliance
2014 Wilsonville: Winning alliance
2014 Worlds: Deans List Winner
Reply With Quote