Thread: Value & Credibility of 4th robots on an Alliance
View Single Post
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-07-2016, 10:09
ASD20's Avatar
ASD20 ASD20 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Andrew
FRC #4761 (The Robockets)
Team Role: College Student
  
Join Date: Jan 2015
Rookie Year: 2014
Location: Reading, MA
Posts: 272
ASD20 has much to be proud ofASD20 has much to be proud ofASD20 has much to be proud ofASD20 has much to be proud ofASD20 has much to be proud ofASD20 has much to be proud ofASD20 has much to be proud ofASD20 has much to be proud ofASD20 has much to be proud of
Re: Value & Credibility of 4th robots on an Alliance
Quote:
Originally Posted by g_sawchuk View Post
An ALLIANCE is, as defined by the manual:
a set of up to four (4) FIRST Robotics Competition Teams who play FIRST STRONGHOLD together
As far as I'm concerned, that's the end of the discussion. If the manual says the 4th bot is part of the alliance, then they are. I do think that right now the 4 bot alliance puts the 4th bot in an awkward spot of feeling unworthy and needing to justify why they deserve the win, but people do the same thing to the 3rd bot as well. I do think that something needs to change, whether it's just a culture shift or a change to the system, but overall I like the 4 bot alliance and the potential strategy opportunities. I wish that DCMPs would change to the 4 bot alliances as well.
__________________

Reply With Quote