Quote:
Originally Posted by ASD20
Well, what it comes down to is exactly when the 4th bot needs to be played. If the rule is something like the 3rd and 4th bots must alternate playing or the 4th bot of both alliances must play the second match, it removes the disadvantage that the losing alliance would have if the rule was literally every bot must play at least once. I still am not a fan because it would remove a large amount of the benefits of picking a strategic 4th bot which is what I think is the best part (or at least, holds the most promise) of the whole 4-bot alliance system right now.
|
Sorry, I think you're mistaking me for someone who gives a crap about whether 4th bots are played. I was merely remarking that the "all bots must play at least one match" rule worked fine in 2004.