|
Re: pic: Streamlined Basketball Drive
The weight of the robot (excepting the basketballs) is supported by the downward-facing ball casters. Basketballs are typically pressurized to 8psi, so assuming the robot weighs 100 lb, you would need to apply that force over 3+ square inches on each ball. As the casters are not that large, the basketball would significantly deform at this point to bear the load, interfering with the drive-ability (though obviating the need for springs). Deformation would get worse under acceleration. I would consider stiffer balls, perhaps like asid61's suggestion of metal (or rubber over metal) ones, or at least larger load-bearing ball casters.
Edit: This would be even cooler as a kiwi; I think the forces would add up properly for rotation and translation, though less efficiently at the ball-carpet interface.
In either case, It appears that the inverse kinematic equations are to drive each wheel as though it were an omni, but in the opposite direction. Negative Killough/Mecanum for four-ball, negative kiwi for three-ball.
__________________
If you can't find time to do it right, how are you going to find time to do it over?
If you don't pass it on, it never happened.
Robots are great, but inspiration is the reason we're here.
Friends don't let friends use master links.
Last edited by GeeTwo : 20-07-2016 at 22:41.
|