Thread: Value & Credibility of 4th robots on an Alliance
View Single Post
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-07-2016, 10:00
dirtbikerxz's Avatar
dirtbikerxz dirtbikerxz is offline
Captain | Driver | CAD | Junior
AKA: Rohit Gondi
FRC #3991 (KnightVision)
Team Role: Driver
  
Join Date: Nov 2014
Rookie Year: 2015
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 480
dirtbikerxz has much to be proud ofdirtbikerxz has much to be proud ofdirtbikerxz has much to be proud ofdirtbikerxz has much to be proud ofdirtbikerxz has much to be proud ofdirtbikerxz has much to be proud ofdirtbikerxz has much to be proud ofdirtbikerxz has much to be proud ofdirtbikerxz has much to be proud ofdirtbikerxz has much to be proud of
Re: Value & Credibility of 4th robots on an Alliance
I just remembered a question I had from all of this talk about 4th robots.
People give me advice on this :

Say for example my team was picked by another team for their alliance. We get to a match where I STRONGLY believe that a field setup of the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th bot would have a better chance of winning that match (the captain bot sits out), how would I approach the alliance captains and propose my idea to them without sounding rude?
__________________

Team 3991: Driver since freshman (2015-), Captain since sophomore (2016-), CADer
"The human condition is not perfect. We are not perfect specimens, any of us. We're not robots." - Michael Ovitz
My posts may or may not reflect the views of my team, they are my opinions, and mine alone.
Last edited by dirtbikerxz : 22-07-2016 at 10:05.
Reply With Quote