View Single Post
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-07-2016, 19:55
Christopher149 Christopher149 is offline
Registered User
FRC #0857 (Superior Roboworks) FTC 10723 (SnowBots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Houghton, MI
Posts: 1,103
Christopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: California District Proposal, Rev 2

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricH View Post
I think that it contains both requirements and suggestions. The hard part is knowing which is which!

For example, I would think it possible for an event to have pits and field on different levels--the catch is that said event would need a device to safely move the robots between levels (commonly known as either a ramp or an elevator, depending on vertical distance, and preferably a freight elevator with some speed to transport lots of robots at once).
FIM St. Joseph had (and probably still does?) have the pits a few feet lower than the field and uses a ramp.
__________________
2015-present: FTC 10723 mentor
2012-present: 857 mentor
2008-2011: 857 student

2015: Industrial Design, Excellence in Engineering, District Finalist, Archimedes Division (#6 alliance captain)
2014: Judges Award, District Engineering Inspiration, District Finalist, Galileo Division

Reply With Quote