Thread: Value & Credibility of 4th robots on an Alliance
View Single Post
  #118   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-07-2016, 20:20
dirtbikerxz's Avatar
dirtbikerxz dirtbikerxz is online now
Captain | Driver | CAD | Junior
AKA: Rohit Gondi
FRC #3991 (KnightVision)
Team Role: Driver
  
Join Date: Nov 2014
Rookie Year: 2015
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 440
dirtbikerxz has much to be proud ofdirtbikerxz has much to be proud ofdirtbikerxz has much to be proud ofdirtbikerxz has much to be proud ofdirtbikerxz has much to be proud ofdirtbikerxz has much to be proud ofdirtbikerxz has much to be proud ofdirtbikerxz has much to be proud ofdirtbikerxz has much to be proud ofdirtbikerxz has much to be proud of
Re: Value & Credibility of 4th robots on an Alliance
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Wallace View Post
Hmm ....

Would I want my team to be selected in support of a mutually assured destruction strategy?
Just think about it. If ur team was considered as part of a mutually assured destruction strategy, that means that you must be hella good to do some damage
__________________

Team 3991: Driver since freshman (2015-), Captain since sophomore (2016-), CADer
"The human condition is not perfect. We are not perfect specimens, any of us. We're not robots." - Michael Ovitz
My posts may or may not reflect the views of my team, they are my opinions, and mine alone.
Reply With Quote