Quote:
Originally Posted by ctt956
What if there were two rankings? One would be the current ranking system, while the other would be teams ranked by how much they score in matches? It could just be based on their average score/alliance contribution in the matches they've played.
|
For what purpose? To try to estimate what a teams ranking will be or to try to assess how good teams are? If it's the latter, TBA already as OPR somewhere for the top n teams. If it's the former, OPR (or whatever modified version you like) has absolutely no correlation to the current ranking system. It will also never become an official stat, let alone ranking method, by FIRST because it completely goes against what FIRST believes in.