View Single Post
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-08-2016, 20:11
Cothron Theiss's Avatar
Cothron Theiss Cothron Theiss is online now
Registered User
FRC #4462 (Full Metal Jackets)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Kingston, Tennessee
Posts: 522
Cothron Theiss has a brilliant futureCothron Theiss has a brilliant futureCothron Theiss has a brilliant futureCothron Theiss has a brilliant futureCothron Theiss has a brilliant futureCothron Theiss has a brilliant futureCothron Theiss has a brilliant futureCothron Theiss has a brilliant futureCothron Theiss has a brilliant futureCothron Theiss has a brilliant futureCothron Theiss has a brilliant future
Re: pic: Its twins - prototype drives

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonny_Jee View Post
I'm a little late to the party here but according to MEADinfo.org

1 Spur 1:1 to 6:1 94-98% Efficient
2 Straight Bevel 3:2 to 5:1 93-97% Efficient

reference:
"Comparison of Gear Efficiencies." MEADinfo.org . N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Aug. 2016. <http://www.meadinfo.org/2008/11/gear-efficiency-spur-helical-bevel-worm.html>.
Are those figures assuming that exact center to center spacing is used? If so, spacing those gears out just a few thousandths can squeeze out some extra percentage points to make up for any loss. It's the first stage of gearing, so the loss in load capacity shouldn't be an issue.

Looking at that page, I realized the OP could probably switch to spiral bevel gears without much increase in price, depending on the supplier they're using, but since they already have the straight bevel gears they need, it probably doesn't matter.
__________________
"It's taking longer than expected, which was to be expected."

Last edited by Cothron Theiss : 11-08-2016 at 20:13.
Reply With Quote