Quote:
Originally Posted by AGPapa
Thanks! I found it interesting that the 1st picks did better than the captains.
...snip...
|
So, it makes sense if you look at the probability of the two roles. You can end up in the #1 spot as a decent, but not the top performing team. In fact you may be not even a top 10 team at an event.
That first pick is almost always the top or 2nd from the top (when top team is #1).
I know when doing the initial points proposal for FiM, being the "first pick" at an event had the highest correlation with being most competitive and/or most likely to win during a season.
What would be really interesting is to see this chart from 2009 through about 2012. The district Points section would have been extremely high correlation through that time period.