[wilsonmw04]

Originally Posted by Sperkowsky

Personally as a creationist I'm not too thrilled with a Darwin division. I'm sure there are others that feel similarly. Not trying to start a war here I just figured I'd throw that out there. Being Darwins 'discoveries' are controversial im not exactly sure why first thought it was a good idea to use his name opposed to thousands of other names that they could have potentially used.

You might want to read "Belief in God in an Age of Science" by Polkinghorne.
here's a link. You might find it interesting. He's a Theoretical Physicist who is also an Anglican priest.

As for science being controversial: almost all large leaps of science are considered controversial by one group or another. Relax about Darwin. He deserves to be recognized for this body of work and thought.