Quote:
Originally Posted by Nuttyman54
Just to make sure people understand here: Adam's example is valid proof that putting an encoder on an outer wheel axle will not inherently add too much variability to produce reliable autos.
I feel that it's worth adding that this is possible because 254 properly tensions their chains, which means the backlash/slop between the outer wheels and directly driven wheels is minimal. If you're using WCP sliding versablocks, you should be able to tension your chain/belt well enough to make this a viable solution as well.
As an aside, 254 and 971 gave a great talk at Champs 2015 which is recorded on Youtube about Motion Profiling and Control which is super helpful to understand how they get such reliable auto control. Worth looking at.
TLDR; If you have a reasonable tensioning method for your chains (esp sliding bearing blocks) you should be fine putting an encoder on one of the outer wheel axles.
|
The plan has shifted to using 9mm belts on a direct c-c with the wcp side bearing blocks. My thought was utilizing feed forward as suggested by a teammate to minimize any slop. Is there a noticeable difference between mounting to the output shaft or rear wheel axle, specifically in regards to necessary programming to counter backlash/slop?