[ctt956]

Originally Posted by JustinCAD

I want to mention that I've gone back and looked at some different spam accounts that I had reported in the past: They have team numbers and cities already entered.

The accounts I looked at had #0000 as a team number, but one account has it's location as Las Vegas, and another as San Francisco. So either the spam bot is able to enter this in, or the two accounts I looked at were run by humans. This proves that they have the ability to enter things into these fields. After all, it is required.

Some of them have entered 0007 or another number. At least one entered FTC as its competition. And the titles are getting more believeable. There was one "about" build season and another "about" motors.

Originally Posted by frcguy

Yep.

Just a thought: What do people think about students serving as moderators or maybe in a position like a moderator but with less power?

Originally Posted by Hitchhiker 42

Personally, as a student - against. I don't think that students will have the responsibility to do it properly. Granted, even some adults aren't great moderators, but the chance that a student does not-so-good things is higher.

Originally Posted by Sperkowsky

As the resident student with the "we can do it too attitude" I am not too sure about this. Not because of how good the students will do. I think a student can mod just as good as adults. But, because of the backlash from others.

I wouldn't be opposed to student moderators. I think that they should just have restrictions on what they're allowed to do. As others have said, there are some students that would probably be great moderators, and some adults who wouldn't.

Originally Posted by Philip Arola

Some imageboards I frequent have positions called janitors who only deal with spam/illegal content. They actually seem to work pretty well.

That sounds like a good idea. Maybe if student moderators could only "hide" posts, then adults would review them and decide whether or not to delete them?