View Single Post
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-09-2016, 12:53
D.Allred's Avatar
D.Allred D.Allred is offline
Registered User
FRC #4451 (Rat Rod Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 208
D.Allred has a reputation beyond reputeD.Allred has a reputation beyond reputeD.Allred has a reputation beyond reputeD.Allred has a reputation beyond reputeD.Allred has a reputation beyond reputeD.Allred has a reputation beyond reputeD.Allred has a reputation beyond reputeD.Allred has a reputation beyond reputeD.Allred has a reputation beyond reputeD.Allred has a reputation beyond reputeD.Allred has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [FIRST EMAIL] Stop Build Day Survey

Quote:
Originally Posted by indieFan View Post
I can see the argument going both ways.

No: The districts can be seen as allowing for the iterative process because you test your robot, then make changes. All engineering requires an iterative process.

Yes: For the reasons you mention above, plus the goal of getting to DCMP.

Personally, not only would I like to keep SBD, but I would like to get rid of the unbag times before the districts. Unbag times defeat the purpose of SBD. (Unbag times between events makes sense to fix things.)

I've been on teams that went to regionals, champs, and districts. Districts are the same length of time as regionals (3 days), so why is there a different structure to the unbagging rules? It makes no sense to me.
Thanks for the clarification. I have a better understanding of your perspective.

I'd rather extend that unbagging rule to regional teams than deny districts that option. We'll agree to disagree on that point.

It's a good debate to have. However, the survey didn't address this middle ground that already exists within the district system.

David
Reply With Quote